Any prosecutor that rests upon B.A.C. as incontrovertible proof of his case is stomping all over the very constitution that he swore an oath to defend. Obviously he is bought and paid for. Any judge that would allow this charade in his court is overseeing a kangaroo court of the highest circus degree, and is also stomping on the very constitution he swore an oath to uphold. Shame on both of them.
|
||||||
|
Any judge that would allow such devilry in court, is allowing a very wicked and malicious thing. Can one assume that a judge that would allow such pseudo science just doesn’t care what goes on in his court room? Is he complicit in the deception? Who can say? We expect a judge, who regularly hears DUI cases, to be completely aware of all the science behind the case, real or otherwise. |
||||||
|
Boundless Enterprise ™ © 2012 No Last Call - All Rights Reserved |
||||||
